Week 6 - LDC - Leadership Theories and Styles
Class Notes
Leadership Theories, Attributes and Styles.
Theories:
These theories could be labelled in four broad headings- namely the Trait theories, Behavioral theories, Contingency theories and the Power and Influence theories.
Leadership Theories, Attributes and Styles.
Theories:
These theories could be labelled in four broad headings- namely the Trait theories, Behavioral theories, Contingency theories and the Power and Influence theories.
Types of Leadership - Styles drawn from Theories
- Autocratic or Authoritarian Style of Leadership
- Under the autocratic leadership style, all decision-making powers are centralised in the leader.
- Laissez-faire or Free-rein Style of Leadership
- A person may be in a leadership position without providing leadership, leaving the group to fend for itself.
- Participative or Democratic Style of Leadership
- A participative or democratic style of leadership involves the leader sharing decision- making abilities with group members while also promoting the interests of the group members and practicing social equality.
- Transformational Style of Leadership
- The transformational leadership style is one of the most inspiring leadership styles that enhances the motivation, morale and job performance of followers. According to Burns, transformational leadership can be seen when "leaders and followers make each other to advance to a higher level of morality and motivation."
Based on a three-year study of over 3,000 executives, Daniel Goleman identified six different leadership styles:
- Pace-setting
- Authoritative
- Affiliative
- Democratic
- Coaching
- coercive or commanding
Task: Leadership styles I'm good at:
Thinking back to significant moments of me needing to lead I believe I have melded 2 styles - Authoritative and Democratic. One event which involved fundraising and leading a group of 32 youth overseas required an Authoritative leadership style. I needed to present a vision and what was needed to achieve it, pointing out the positive benefits for the individuals and wider community.
One of the long term goal was to build a community for our parish youth that would be self sustaining and draw on talents amongst those youth. This required a shift to Democratic leadership where I created platforms where the youth could experience collaboration, leadership and constructive feedback to one another.
Within the classroom as the teacher I believe I work mostly within a Coercive style after presenting the goal or vision in a Authoritative manner. I believe the Coercive style was the most natural style to follow as it has aspects that are part of the traditional, industrial way of education - "Do as I say."
Taking the Quiz - What Sort of Leader are You?
Overall, you have a reasonable mix of leadership styles but there is still a lot of opportunity to develop them further.
|
Your most developed leadership style is:
Pace-Setter
Pace-setting leaders expect excellence and self-direction, and can be summed up as ‘Do as I do, now’. The Pace-setter very much leads by example, but this type of leadership only works with a highly-competent and well-motivated team. It can only be sustained for a while without team members flagging. Like the Coercive leader, Pace-setters also show drive to succeed and initiative, but instead of self-control, these are coupled with conscientiousness.
Identifying with a Leadership Theory
I've based my identification on my experience from the past two years during staff PD and our weekly Team 1 meetings. While in both platforms we have the opportunity for a say in offering our thoughts it does an underlying element or feeling that ultimately the final decision will be decided by management. While I enjoy having a voice I often hold back because I think 'is anyone really listening?'
Of course how can you not read about the aspects of Transformational Leadership and not be attracted to the concept of it having an impact on you by enhancing motivation, morale and job performance. I look forward to exploring this more especially in relation to my role as a leader for my students.
10 Leadership Theories by Professor Michael Zigarelli
https://app.themindlab.com/media/13592/view
The Six Leadership Styles - Daniel Goleman
https://app.themindlab.com/media/13596/view
According to the authors, the more of the six styles a leader can deploy, the better. Leaders who have mastered four or more styles tend to be the most effective. Effective leaders scan people individually and in groups and adjust their style suitably. They are good at the four resonance building styles – Visionary, Coaching, Affliative and Democratic.
Leadership dilemmas ‐ Promoting collaboration
You have introduced self and peer assessment into your class but you are finding that students are struggling to provide critique beyond very simple surface features.How might you lead your students in a manner that increases the quality of this method of assessment?
I believe a combination of at least 3 leadership styles would be beneficial here. I’m going to use the example of Austin’s Butterfly here. The primary purpose here is to teach Perseverance by way of creating several drafts as they work towards the highest standard
Visionary: Showing the students exemplars of what they are working towards. e.g. The final image of a Blue Butterfly and examples of previous students and their drafts. Based on Daniel Coleman’s table this modus operandi mobilizes a person toward a vision. The underlying emotional intelligence competencies are self-confidence and change catalyst This style works best when a clear direction is needed.
Coaching: Here this style is recommended to help someone improve performance or develop long-term strengths. The style in a phrase could be “Try this.” Here modelling and talk aloud would support this.
Democratic: Underlying competencies here are collaboration and communication. The students are in a sense leading their peers to forge consensus through collaboration. Leadership for Transforming High Schools
Commissioned by Wallace Foundation
Transformational leadership for education in a digital culture
Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Coleman
Notes from Teacher Pd January 2016
DCL - Connected Learning and Connectivism
Overview
How do we create an education system where learning is no longer the variable that is framed by the constant of a dated delivery model and restrictive learning times. Knowledge is now available everywhere, 24 hours a day so new models of education must recognise learning as a constant with delivery modes and learning times as the variables.
Class Notes
Connected learning seeks to find ways to connect the lives and experiences of learners to the outcomes that educators feel are necessary to prepare students for their futures.
Connectivism suggests that learning only really takes place in networks. A broader approach to connected learning emphasizes the importance of learning that takes place beyond the formal lesson or the formal classroom.
How connected is your presence as teacher?
The Essence of Connected Learning
https://app.themindlab.com/media/13685/view
Connected Learning - The experience of Education REIMAGINED
Chicago City of Learning - Connected Learning Environments
A project which goal is to provide students free virtual learning opportunities as well as live activities outside of his/her school and neighborhood. Since these learning experiences are driven by the student’s specific interests, it allows him/her to take ownership of their personalized learning experiences. They try to provide students connected learning environments by linking learning in school, home and community.
Credit: Connected Learning Research Network and Digital Media & Learning Research HubGeorge Siemens on Connectivism
Why Connected Learning? - Video - by Mini Ito |
No comments:
Post a Comment